ZILKANICH
v.
UNITED STATES
PER CURIAM.
This is an appeal from a conviction and sentence under an indictment charging violation of the Selective Training and Service Act of 1940, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix, § 301 et seq., in failing to report for induction pursuant to the order of a local Draft Board. Defendant is a member of the sect known as Jehovah’s Witnesses and claims exemption from the provisions of the act on the ground that he is a minister of religion.
Appellant was tried in the court below prior to the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Falbo v. United States, 64 S.Ct. 346, decided January.3, 1944. The trial court was of opinion that there was-nothing in the evidence to impeach the validity of the Draft Board’s order and declined to submit to the jury the defense that he was a minister of religion. An examination of the record convinces us that this was correct under our decisions in Baxley v. United States, 4 Cir., 134 F. 2d 998; Goff v. United States, 4 Cir., 135 F. 2d 610; Honaker v. United States, 4 Cir., 135 F. 2d 613. Under the decision in the Falbo case, supra, there can be no question whatever as to the correctness of the trial court’s action.
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
In re Ingersoll Co. Middelkamp v. Lea Tr., 148 F.2d 282 (10th Cir. 1945)
-
Goggin v. Byram, 172 F.2d 868 (9th Cir. 1949)
Authorities Cited
- Falbo v. United States, 320 U.S. 549 (U.S. 1944)
- Goff v. United States, 135 F.2d 610 (4th Cir. 1943)
- Baxley v. United States, 134 F.2d 998 (4th Cir. 1943)
- Honaker v. United States, 135 F.2d 613 (4th Cir. 1943)
- Slaughter v. Wright, 135 F.2d 613 (4th Cir. 1943)