JOHNSON ELECTRIC COMPANY AND CINCINNATI INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLANTS,
v.
THOMAS H. PROVENZANO, APPELLEE
JOHNSON ELECTRIC COMPANY AND CINCINNATI INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLANTS,
THOMAS H. PROVENZANO, APPELLEE
415 So. 2d 745
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1982)
Caution
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
The order is AFFIRMED with two modifications. The word “remedial” is deleted from paragraph 8 of the Deputy Commissioner’s findings regarding further care and treatment to be provided by Dr. Levreault. In paragraph 2 of the decretal portion of the order, “palliative” is substituted for “remedial.” Remedial treatment is inappropriate following the date of maximum medical improvement. Killebrew Manufacturing Co. v. Dawson, 401 So. 2d 876 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981).
MILLS, LARRY G. SMITH and SHAW, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Fla. Structures, Inc. v. Hallie A. Morton, 443 So. 2d 444 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984)…ort is proper after the claimant has reached his maximum level of improvement. See 2 Larson, The Law of Workmen’s Compensation, § 61.14 (1982); DiGiorgio Fruit Corporation v. Pittman, 49 So. 2d 600 (Fla.1950); Johnson Electric Company v. Provenzano, 415 So. 2d 745 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982). The deputy’s award of "continued palliative care" was therefore not erroneous.…
Authorities Cited
- Killebrew Mfg. Co. & the Home Indem. Co. v. Dawson, 401 So. 2d 876 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981)