LARRY ALAN STRICKLAND, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 1982-06-16
No. AG-499
JOANOS and WIGGINTON, JJ., concur.
415 So. 2d 808 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1982)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

Defendant Strickland appeals his life sentence for attempted first degree murder with a firearm. The court affirms, holding that Florida Statute § 775.087 permits reclassification of a first degree felony to a life felony when a firearm is used, even in attempted murder cases where the firearm is not an essential element of the crime.


Holding

A life sentence for attempted first degree murder committed with a firearm is proper under § 775.087, which reclassifies a first degree felony to a life felony when the defendant possesses a weapon or firearm during commission of the felony, unless use of the weapon is an essential element of the crime.


Headnotes

[1] A first-degree felony is reclassified to a life felony when the defendant possesses a weapon or firearm during the commission of the felony, unless the use of a weapon or…

[2] The reclassification provision of § 775.087, Fla.Stat., supports a life sentence for attempted first-degree murder committed by a defendant while in possession of a firea…

Previewing 2 of 3 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Key Quotes

“Defendant cites King v. State, 390 So. 2d 315 (Fla.1980) and Bolden v. State, 404 So. 2d 417 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981) for the proposition that attempts to commit a capital felony are sentenced as first degree felonies, not as life felonies, even if committed with a firearm or weapon.”

Establishes defendant's primary argument on appeal

Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

Defendant was convicted of attempted first degree murder with a firearm. He received a life sentence. The judgment and sentence specifically reflected…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
THOMPSON, Judge.

THOMPSON, Judge.

Defendant appeals his life sentence for attempted first degree murder with a firearm.

We affirm. Defendant cites King v. State, 390 So. 2d 315 (Fla.1980) and Bolden v. State, 404 So. 2d 417 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981) for the proposition that attempts to commit a capital felony are sentenced as first degree felonies, not as life felonies, even if committed with a firearm or weapon.

However, for the following reasons we do not find King and Bolden controlling. In King the State conceded that the trial court erred in sentencing the defendant to life for attempted first degree murder committed while in possession of a weapon.

Furthermore, the state apparently did not bring to the court’s attention in King the applicability of § 775.087, Fla.Stat., which reclassifies a first degree felony to a life felony when the defendant possesses a weapon or firearm during the commission of the felony unless the use of a weapon or firearm is an essential element of the felony. Likewise, in Bolden the state did not call attention to § 775.087.

However, in the instant case the state has raised the applicability of § 775.-087.

Since the use of a firearm is not an essential element of attempted first degree murder, we find that the reclassification provision of § 775.087 is applicable.

We agree with Williams v. State, 407 So. 2d 223 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981) that § 775.087 supports a life sentence for attempted first degree murder committed by a defendant while in possession of a firearm.

We note that in Williams the state did not point out the applicability of § 775.087 until the motion for rehearing. Since the instant judgment and sentence specifically reflects that defendant was adjudicated guilty of attempted first degree murder while in possession of a firearm, remand is not required as it was in Williams.

Accordingly, we find that the trial court properly sentenced the instant defendant to life imprisonment. AFFIRMED.

JOANOS and WIGGINTON, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw