HIRSCH IMPROVEMENT CO.
v.
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE

2d Cir. | 1944-05-19
No. 55
143 F.2d 912 United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (1944) Caution
Cited by 14 cases

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The court held that a payment received by the taxpayer was not income for the taxable year because it was to be repaid under uncertain circumstances, and the taxpayer was doing business in the taxable year.


Facts & Procedural History

The taxpayer received a $35,000 payment which the court determined was not rent for the year of receipt. The taxpayer was also found to be doing busin…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
FRANK, Circuit Judge.

FRANK, Circuit Judge.

1. The question is whether the payment of the $35,000 was basically rent in the year in which taxpayer received it. That it was rent for a future year would he unimportant. It is also unimportant how taxpayer regarded or treated it. Its character turns on the terms of the lease itself. If the taxpayer had been required to segregate the payment, then it would not have been income for the taxable year. No such obligation here existed. But more than the absence of that obligation is needed to justify the conclusion that it was income in the year of its receipt. How much more is needed is a question not to be answered in a simple categorical manner. Where the line is to be drawn depends in each case on the provisions of the particular lease.2 The lease here supports the Tax Court’s decision. For the sum received was to be repaid, in whole or part, under circumstances which might never occur and of a kind so limited as to be insufficient to require that sum to be categorized as primarily not intended as rent. The facts in Warren Service Corporation v. Commissioner, 2 Cir., 110 F. 2d 723 were substantially different. Expressions in Clinton Hotel Realty Corp. v. Commissioner, 5 Cir., 128 F. 2d 968, so far as they may appear to be inconsistent with our decision, were qualified by a subsequent case in the same Circuit, Astor Holding Co. v. Commissioner, 5 Cir., 135 F. 2d 47, 146 A.L.R. 993, where the Court decided against the taxpayer on facts very similar to those of the instant case.3

2. The Tax Court correctly held that the taxpayer was doing business in the taxable year 1936. Our opinion in New London Northern R. Co. v. Smith, 2 Cir., 141 F. 2d 219 amply covers that point.

Affirmed.

Until all possible cases have been decided there will seem to exist what Thomas Reed Powell calls “an undulating equator.”

For the detailed facts, see the opinion of the Board, 1942, C.C.H., Board of Tax Appeals Service, § 12,599D, at p. 38,816.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

Previewing 3 of 7 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw