REILLY ET AL.
v.
MILLIS ET AL.
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that a certification of collective bargaining representatives by the National Labor Relations Board is not a final order reviewable by the courts.
Employees of a bank sought a mandatory injunction to expunge a Direction of Election and certification of collective bargaining representatives from t…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Mandatory Injunction cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Plaintiffs below are twenty employees of the City National Bank and Trust Company of Chicago. They ask for a mandatory injunction to set aside and expunge from the records of the National Labor Relations Board a Direction of Election and certification of the collective bargaining representatives of their group. The court below dismissed the complaint.
The National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 151 et seq., does not provide for a review of the proceedings of the Board in connection with the investigation and certification of representatives for collective bargaining except after the Board has entered a final order based on the facts certified in such proceedings. The certification itself is not such an order. The complaint on its face does not show that plaintiffs are threatened with irreparable injury as a consequence of the certification. They make no showing of any special circumstances which make the review provided by statute an inadequate remedy for the matters set out in their complaint.
The judgment of the court below will be affirmed on the authority of American Federation of Labor v. National Labor Relations Board, 1940, 308 U.S. 401, at page 411, 412, 60 S.Ct. 300, at page 305, 84 L.Ed. 347. See also Switchmen's Union of North America v. National Mediation Board, 1943, 320 U.S. 297, 64 S.Ct. 95; Brotherhood of Railway & Steamship Clerks, Freight Handlers, Express & Station Employees v. United Transport Service Employees of America, 1943, 320 U.S. 715, 64 S.Ct. 260, reversing Brotherhood of Railway and Steamship Clerks, Freight Handlers, Express and Station Employees v. United Transport Service Employees of America, 1943, 78 U.S.App.D.C. 125, 137 F. 2d 817; Employers Group of Motor Freight Carriers, Inc., v. National War Labor Board, No. 8680, - U.S.App.D.C. -, 143 F. 2d 145.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Inland Empire Dist. Council v. Millis, 325 U.S. 697 (U.S. 1945)
-
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Cent. Dispensary & Emergency Hosp., 145 F.2d 852 (D.C. Cir. 1944)
-
de Pratter v. Farmer, 232 F.2d 74 (D.C. Cir. 1956)
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Am. Fed'n of Labor v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 308 U.S. 401 (U.S. 1940)
- Switchmen's Union of N. Am. v. Nat'l Mediation Bd., 320 U.S. 297 (U.S. 1943)
- Emp'rs Grp. of Motor Freight Carriers, Inc. v. Nat'l War Labor Bd., 143 F.2d 145 (D.C. Cir. 1944)
- Brotherhood of Railway and Steamship Clerks v. United Transp. Serv. Emps. of Am., 137 F.2d 817 (D.C. Cir. 1943)
- Bhd. of Ry. & S.S. Clerks v. United Transp. Serv. Emps., 320 U.S. 715 (U.S. 1943)
- Kelley v. California, 320 U.S. 715 (U.S. 1943)