SANDERSON ET AL.
v.
UNITED STATES

5th Cir. | 1944-12-09
No. 10950
Before SIBLEY, HOLMES, and McCORD, Circuit Judges.
145 F.2d 825 Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (1944)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The court held that it would not review errors not preserved in the trial court unless exceptional circumstances exist.


Facts & Procedural History

Appellants were convicted of conspiracy to possess explosives. They did not object to evidence, the charge, or jury arguments at trial, nor did they q…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
HOLMES, Circuit Judge.

HOLMES, Circuit Judge.

Four persons were jointly indicted, tried, and convicted of conspiracy to possess explosives in violation of Chapter 8, § 121 et seq., Title 50, of the United States Code Annotated. From the judgment and sentence, three of the defendants appealed; but the appeal of the defendant Clark was dismissed by him in this court.

The record shows that, though appellants were represented by competent counsel in their trial, no objection was made to any evidence offered, to the charge of the court, or to the argument of counsel before the jury; and the sufficiency of the evidence was not questioned by a motion for a directed verdict. It is only where exceptional circumstances are present, such as obvious reversible errors, or errors that affect the fairness, integrity, or public reputation of judicial proceedings, that this court of its own motion may set aside the verdict of the jury for an error or errors not brought to the attention of the trial court.1 This is not such a case.

The judgment is affirmed.

United States v. Atkinson. 207 U.S. 157, 56 S.Ct. 391, 80 L.Ed. 555: Benson v. United States, 5 Cir., 112 F. 2d 422.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw