RICE
v.
THE MARION A. C. MESECK ET AL. THE GEORGE R.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Vicarious Liability cases and more on FLexlaw
The Golden Rule, 1925, A.M.C. 297, 298.
There the tug left the barge, undamaged, at a place designated by the company which employed the tug, and the court held that the tug’s duty then ended. The court said, “It was of course obligatory on the tug to do the work in a scamanlike manner, hut sho was not chargeable as is a vessel contracting for towage, in respect of propriety in starting out. and safety at the point of mooring and leaving.” It should be noted that the court held, on the facts, that there was no negligence in the place of mooring the barge.
Quinn v. Southgate Nelson Corp., 2 Cir., 121 F. 2d 190, 191, certiorari denied 314 U.S. 682, 62 S.Ct. 185, 86 L.Ed. 546. See also Brady v. Roosevelt S. S. Co., 317 U.S. 575, 581, 63 S.Ct. 425, 87 L.Ed. 471.
Cf. The Procida, D.C., 243 F. 251, 253; The Edward G. Murray, 2 Cir., 278 F. 895, 897.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
United States v. Carroll Towing Co., Inc., 159 F.2d 169 (2d Cir. 1947)
-
Todd Shipyards Corp. v. Moran Towing & Transp. Co., Inc., 247 F.2d 626 (2d Cir. 1957)
Authorities Cited
- Brady v. Roosevelt S.S. Co., 317 U.S. 575 (U.S. 1943)
- Quinn v. Southgate Nelson Corp., 121 F.2d 190 (2d Cir. 1941)
- Moloney Elec. Co. v. Helvering, 314 U.S. 682 (U.S. 1941)