W. M. WELCH MFG. CO.
v.
COE, COM'R OF PATENTS
W. M. WELCH MFG. CO.
COE, COM'R OF PATENTS
149 F.2d 12
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia (1945)
Topics
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Invention cases and more on FLexlaw
Opinion of the Court
Radtke Patents Corporation v. Coe, 74 App.D.C. 251, 268, 122 F. 2d 937, 954; L. Sonneborn Sons, Inc. v. Coe, 70 App. D.C. 97, 100, 104 F. 2d 230, 233; Minnesota Mining & Mfg. Co. v. Coe, 69 App.D.C. 217, 220, 99 F. 2d 986, 989; cf. The Mathieson Alkali Works, Inc. v. Coe, 69 App. D.C. 210, 214, 99 F. 2d 443, 447.
Cherry-Burrell Corporation v. Coe, 79 U.S.App.D.C. 124, 143 F. 2d 372; Lucke v. Coe, 63 App.D.C. 61, 69 F. 2d 379; Shoemaker v. Robertson, 60 App. Div. 345, 54 F. 2d 456.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Radtke Patents Corp. v. COE, 122 F.2d 937 (D.C. Cir. 1941)
- Minn. Mining & MFG. Co. v. COE, 99 F.2d 986 (D.C. Cir. 1938)
- L. Sonneborn Sons, Inc. v. COE, 104 F.2d 230 (D.C. Cir. 1939)
- Lucke v. COE, 69 F.2d 379 (D.C. Cir. 1934)
- Cherry-Burrell Corp. v. COE, 143 F.2d 372 (D.C. Cir. 1944)
- Shoemaker v. Robertson, 54 F.2d 456 (D.C. Cir. 1931)
- The Mathieson Alkali Works, Inc. v. COE, 99 F.2d 443 (D.C. Cir. 1938)