WATKINS MOTOR LINES, INC. AND EMPLOYERS INSURANCE OF WAUSAU, APPELLANTS,
v.
WILLIAM PRIVETTE, APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 1982-07-08
No. AI-5
LARRY G. SMITH, JOANOS and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.
416 So. 2d 850 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1982) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

Watkins Motor Lines and its insurance carrier appealed an award of temporary total disability benefits and attorney's fees to an injured truck driver. The court reversed, finding no medical evidence supported the disability award and that the attorney's fee award was improper under workers' compensation law.


Holding

The court reversed the award, holding that absent medical evidence of inability to work, a claimant must seek employment within his physical capabilities. The claimant's attempts to work as a truck driver or warehouse worker, despite testified pain preventing such work, did not constitute a good faith work search. Additionally, attorney's fees were improper because the claim involved only temporary total disability benefits, the carrier accepted the accident as compensable, and no bad faith was shown.


Headnotes

[1] A claimant seeking temporary total disability benefits must demonstrate a lack of medical evidence of inability to work and must also conduct a good faith search for work…

[2] An injured employee's attempts to find employment that are impossible due to pain cannot be considered evidence of a good faith work search.

Previewing 2 of 3 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Key Quotes

“Where there is no medical evidence that a claimant is unable to work, he must seek work within his physical capabilities.”

Establishes the legal standard requiring claimants to pursue employment matching their actual medical condition, not merely make general job-search efforts.

Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

Privette, a truck driver, sustained a compensable industrial injury on July 30, 1980, when a 600-pound drum pinned his right hand. He refused recommen…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

The employer/carrier appeal an award of temporary total disability benefits and attorney’s fees. We reverse.

Claimant, a truck driver, sustained a compensable industrial accident on July 30, 1980, when a 600 pound drum slipped and pinned his right hand against the side of the truck. The claimant visited a doctor. Surgery was recommended, but the claimant refused on the grounds that he could not live on workers’ compensation payments for the six to eight weeks required for recovery. He continued to work until February of 1981, at which time he quit because his hand was too painful. After leaving his job with the employer, the claimant made several trips as an owner/operator. The claimant sought temporary total disability benefits from February 21, 1981, the day he stopped working for the employer, until June 15, 1981. The deputy found that there was no medical evidence that the claimant was unable to work during this period, but that he had made a “conscientious effort” to return to work, and tried to work on several occasions but was unable to do so. The deputy awarded temporary total disability benefits for the entire period, “with the exception of when he did work, or tried to work, during that period of time.” The deputy also found that claimant’s attorney was entitled to a reasonable attorney’s fee, reserving jurisdiction to determine the amount at a later date.

The deputy’s finding that there was no medical evidence that claimant was unable to work during the period for which benefits were sought is supported by the evidence. His finding that claimant had made a “conscientious effort” to find work, however, is not. The claimant testified that the pain in his hand made it impossible for him to drive or handle cargo. Consequently, his attempts to obtain employment as a truck driver, or warehouse worker, cannot be considered evidence of a good faith work search. Where there is no medical evidence that a claimant is unable to work, he must seek work within his physical capabilities. Mahler v. Lauderdale Lakes National Bank, 322 So. 2d 507 (Fla.1975); Four Quarters Habitat, Inc. v. Miller, 405 So. 2d 475 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981).

Additionally, it was error for the deputy to determine that claimant’s attorney was entitled to a reasonable attorney’s fee in this case. The claim was for temporary total disability benefits only, the carrier accepted the accident as compensable, and no evidence was introduced which would tend to show that the carrier acted in bad faith. Section 440.34(3), Florida Statutes (1980); Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University v. Vestal, 399 So. 2d 1033 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981).

REVERSED and REMANDED.

LARRY G. SMITH, JOANOS and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • …some question as to her ability to perform such work given the injuries to her leg. A claimant who seeks only such types of work as he or she will be unable to perform has not conducted a good faith work search. Watkins Motor Lines, Inc. v. Private, 416 So. 2d 850 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982). Also of significance is the fact that the record reveals claimant is qualified by education and training to perform at least some types of work other than operating a sewing machine. When questioned as to why she had not sought…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw