ALEXANDER HARVIN, APPELLANT,

v.

THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Chandler v. State, 442 So. 2d 171 (Fla. 1983)
  …is case, however, the defendant spent almost the entire time between the two offenses incarcerated for the first crime, the relevance of that collateral crime to the proof of a common modus operandi is preserved, if not enhanced. See Rossi v. State, 416 So. 2d 1166 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982). We turn now to the issue of whether the trial court, in dismissing certain jurors for cause over the defendant’s objection, violated the rule established by the United States Supreme Court in Witherspoon v. Illinois, 391 U.S. 5…
• Street v. State, 636 So. 2d 1297 (Fla. 1994)
  …on to his pistol, and the officers were able to subdue Street. DeCarlo, who had extensive police training on the subject of cocaine addiction, expressed the opinion that Street was not under the influence of cocaine at that time. In Rossi v. State, 416 So. 2d 1166 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982), the State introduced evidence of a similar criminal act committed by the defendant ten years before in an effort to negate an insanity defense. In affirming the conviction, Judge Anstead wrote: In essence appellant’s defense in…
• Gould v. State, 558 So. 2d 481 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990)
  …nt to show that when appellant eleven months later kidnapped Tracy by forcing her into the bathroom to threaten her life, beat her and also commit sexual batteries, he had the specific intent to do so. An analogous situation arose in Rossi v. State, 416 So. 2d 1166 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982), where the defendant’s defense to kidnapping, sexual battery and attempted second degree murder was insanity. The court held that evidence of a similar prior crime was admissible to prove intent and negate the insanity defense.…