NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
v.
KINNER MOTORS, INC.
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A general exception to a trial examiner's recommendations is insufficient to preserve an objection to a National Labor Relations Board order for appellate review.
The court reviewed two cases involving National Labor Relations Board cease and desist orders. In one case, no objection was made to the order. In the…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Enforcement Of Nlrb Order cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Since the decisions in these cases the Supreme Court has held in National Labor Relations Board v. Cheney California Lumber Co., 66 S.Ct. 553, that unless the respondent in the proceedings before the Board objects to such a general cease and desist order as 1(c) of the Board’s orders in both these cases, the circuit court of appeals must decree its enforcement.
In case No. 10,984 there was no objection to the general cease and desist order 1(c). We order modified our decree of December 29, 1945, in that case and order enforcement of the Board’s cease and desist order 1(c) and the posting of notices thereof.
In case No. 10,956, in which our decree refused enforcement of the general cease and desist order in paragraph 1(c) of the Board’s order, there was no more than a general exception to all the recommendations of the trial examiner. This is not sufficient to satisfy the requirement of Section 10(e) of the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 160(e), that objection must be made to the Board if to be considered by this court. Marshall Field & Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 318 U.S. 253, 256, 63 S.Ct. 585, 87 L.Ed. 744. In case No. 10,956 we order modified our decree of December 29, 1945, to include the enforcement of the Board’s cease and desist order 1(c) and its order for posting notices relative to the cease and desist order.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Cheney Cal. Lumber Co., 327 U.S. 385 (U.S. 1946)
- Marshall Field & Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 318 U.S. 253 (U.S. 1943)