COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, PETITIONER,
v.
HOWARD C. PLATT TRUST, WELLS FARGO BANK & UNION TRUST CO., TRUSTEE, RESPONDENT; SAME V. ESTATE OF E. B. F. TIBBITS, DEC'D, JAMES A. FOLGER & ROBERT W. MILLER, EX'RS, RESPONDENT; SAME V. J. A. FOLGER, RESPONDENT; SAME V. PETER FOLGER, RESPONDENT; SAME V. JOHN M. & EDITH P. CUNNINGHAM TRUST, J. A. FOLGER & PETER FOLGER, TRUSTEES, RESPONDENT; SAME V. ESTATE OF C. E. L. FOLGER, DEC'D, J. A. FOLGER & PETER FOLGER, EX'RS, RESPONDENT; SAME V. EVELYN C. DONOHOE, RESPONDENT; SAME V. ELIZABETH MOFFITT FOLGER TRUST, AMERICAN TRUST COMPANY AND ROBERT WATT MILLER, TRUSTEES, RESPONDENT; SAME V. GLADYS PLATT PENDLETON, RESPONDENT; SAME V. GENEVIEVE C. KENT, RESPONDENT

9th Cir. | 1946-04-16
Nos. 11296-11305
154 F.2d 1016 United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (1946)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

The appellate court reviewed a habeas corpus proceeding concerning extradition, where the petitioner challenged his restraint by the Sheriff based on a Massachusetts warrant and questioned his identity as the fugitive.


Holding

The court affirmed the judgment of remand in the habeas corpus proceedings, implying the lower court's decision regarding the extradition was upheld.


Facts & Procedural History

The petitioner sought a writ of habeas corpus, alleging unlawful restraint by the Sheriff due to a Massachusetts extradition warrant. He raised issues…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the stipulations of counsel for respective parties, filed in each of above causes, for dismissal of the petition for review in each cause, and good cause therefor appearing, it is ordered that the petition for review in each of above causes be dismissed, that a judgment be filed in each cause and recorded in the minutes of this Court accordingly, and that the mandate of this Court in each cause issue forthwith.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw