MICHAEL W. TIDWELL, A MINOR, BY AND THROUGH HIS NATURAL GUARDIAN AND NEXT FRIEND, WINFRED L. TIDWELL, AND WINFRED L. TIDWELL, INDIVIDUALLY, APPELLANT,
v.
THE SOUTHLAND CORPORATION, APPELLEE
McCORD, Judge.
The appellant, Michael W. Tidwell, a minor, sued The Southland Corporation for injuries he suffered when he tripped while jogging on a path on the Corporation’s property and fell into a ditch. The trial court granted a summary judgment in favor of the Southland Corporation.
We find that there are disputed issues of material fact or disputed inferences to be derived from those facts regarding the condition of the path itself and the sufficiency of the lighting for this night-time accident. Accordingly, the cause was not ripe for summary judgment [Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.510(c)], and the judgment must be reversed.
Reversed and remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
ERVIN and JOANOS, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (12 total)
-
Lefemine v. Baron, 573 So. 2d 326 (Fla. 1991)…to the broker. The $38,500 was not so grossly disproportionate to any damages that might reasonably be expected to follow from a breach of the contract so as to show that the parties intended only to induce full performance. See Hooper v. Breneman, 417 So. 2d 315 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982). The controversy in this case arises from the existence of the option granted to the seller either to retain the security deposit as liquidated damages or to bring an action at law for actual damages. In Stenor, Inc. v. Lester,…
-
Bianchi v. Garber, 528 So. 2d 969 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988)…he lighting and maintenance of their walkway at the time she was delivering the paper and whether those conditions were below the standard of care owed to Mrs. Bianchi. Those questions preclude summary judgment. See Tidwell v. Southland Corporation, 417 So. 2d 315 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982) (where summary judgment for the defendant corporation was reversed, the appellate court, finding disputed issues of fact or disputed inferences rising from the facts as to the condition of the path and the sufficiency of lighting…
-
Free v. Free, 936 So. 2d 699 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006)…orm the contract, unless the noncompliance was excused or waived. See JNC Enters., Ltd. v. ICP 1, Inc., 777 So. 2d 1182, 1185 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001) (“JNC was not entitled to specific performance because it was in default.”) (citing Hooper v. Breneman, 417 So. 2d 315 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982) (holding that specific performance was properly denied where buyer had not complied with its contractual obligations)); see also Robinson v. Abreu, 345 So. 2d 404 (Fla. 2d DCA 1977). Robert’s argument overlooks the fact that the…
Previewing 3 of 12 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence