PAUL A. PORTER, PRICE ADMINISTRATOR, OFFICE OF PRICE ADMINISTRATION, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
v.
WENDEE JUNIOR, INC., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
PAUL A. PORTER, PRICE ADMINISTRATOR, OFFICE OF PRICE ADMINISTRATION, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
WENDEE JUNIOR, INC., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
156 F.2d 62
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (1946)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
The appellant contends that Revised Maximum Price Regulation 287 contains no provision fixing the maximum price of garments which do not have the proper minimum allowable cost. Acceptance of this contention concededly requires us to disagree with Bowles v. Biberman Bros., 3 Cir., 152 F. 2d 700. We do not disagree with it. On the authority of that case judgment is affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Fleming v. Richter, 159 F.2d 792 (2d Cir. 1947)
Authorities Cited
- Bowles v. Biberman Bros., Inc., 152 F.2d 700 (3d Cir. 1945)