CHICAGO PNEUMATIC TOOL CO., A CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY, AND CHICAGO PNEUMATIC TOOL CO., A CORPORATION OF MASSACHUSETTS, APPELLANTS,
v.
HUGHES TOOL CO.
CHICAGO PNEUMATIC TOOL CO., A CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY, AND CHICAGO PNEUMATIC TOOL CO., A CORPORATION OF MASSACHUSETTS, APPELLANTS,
HUGHES TOOL CO.
156 F.2d 981
United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit (1946)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 6 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Scrutiny of the briefs and appendices and careful consideration of the oral arguments convince us that the court below committed no error in respect to count 3 of the complaint, the only count before us for consideration. Accordingly the judgment of the court below will be affirmed on the opinion of Judge Leahy, 61 F.Supp. 767, 771, 772.
Judge O’CONNELL participated in the consideration and decision of this case but was unable to collaborate in the preparation of the opinion.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Dawson Chem. Co. v. Rohm & Haas Co., 448 U.S. 176 (U.S. 1980)
-
Aralac, Inc. v. Hat Corp. of Am., 166 F.2d 286 (3d Cir. 1948)
-
Chicago Pneumatic Tool Co. v. Hughes Tool Co. (two cases), 180 F.2d 97 (10th Cir. 1950)