ARNSTEIN
v.
PORTER
ARNSTEIN
PORTER
158 F.2d 795
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (1946)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 6 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
There can be no doubt that the evidence upon the trial presented a disputed issue as to whether the defendant had in fact copied the plaintiff’s music; and that it was not so clearly in the plaintiff’s favor that the judge could properly have directed a verdict. It follows that the only question open upon this appeal is the correctness of the charge. Although the plaintiff did not except to any part of it, we have read it with care, and we hold that it fairly presented the questions which the jury had to decide.
Judgment affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Graham v. Atchison. T. & S. F. Ry. Co., 176 F.2d 819 (9th Cir. 1949)
-
Purvis v. Pa. R. Co., 198 F.2d 631 (3d Cir. 1952)
-
ARC Music Corp. v. Bobbi LEE and Joseph Robinson, 296 F.2d 186 (2d Cir. 1961)