JOSEPH MENDZEE, APPELLANT,
v.
NATIONAL ROOFING CO. AND SOUTHEASTERN FIRE INS. CO., APPELLEES
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that the deputy commissioner erred in determining the claimant's average weekly wage by improperly applying a statutory section and failing to make necessary factual findings.
[1] The average weekly wage calculation under § 440.14(1)(a), Florida Statutes, is applicable only when a claimant has worked during substantially the whole of the thirteen w…
[2] A determination of whether an employee is a part-time worker for the purpose of calculating average weekly wages under § 440.14(1)(f), Florida Statutes, is a factual dete…
Previewing 2 of 3 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceThe claimant appealed the deputy commissioner's order determining his average weekly wage (AWW) for a workers' compensation case. The deputy commissio…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Average Weekly Wage Determination cases and more on FLexlaw
WENTWORTH, Judge.
The claimant in this workers’ compensation case appeals that portion of the deputy commissioner’s order which determines his average weekly wage (AWW). We reverse and remand.
The figure found by the deputy is the average of claimant’s earnings for the thirteen weeks prior to his injury, resulting from apparent application of § 440.14(l)(a), Florida Statutes. Section 440.14(l)(a) is to be utilized in determining an AWW when a claimant has worked “during substantially the whole of 13 weeks immediately preceding the injury.” Since claimant in this case worked only seven of the 13 weeks preceding his injury, that section is inapplicable.
The employer/carrier argues that the AWW assigned by the deputy was proper under § 440.14(l)(f). That section provides:
(f) If it be established that the injured employee was a part-time worker at the time of the injury, that he had adopted part-time employment as his customary practice, and that under normal working conditions he probably would have remained a part-time worker during the period of disability, these factors shall be considered in arriving at his average weekly wages. For the purpose of this paragraph the term ‘part-time worker’ means an individual who customarily works less than the full-time hours or full-time workweek of a similar employee in the same employment.
However, the order does not indicate that the deputy found claimant to be a part-time employee. Clearly such a determination is factual in nature, depending on whether the employee customarily worked part-time and “probably would have remained a part-time worker during the period of disability.”
In the face of these unresolved factual issues, we must reverse and remand to the deputy commissioner to determine the point anew. If claimant was not a part-time worker, the deputy must decide which of the subsections in § 440.14(1), other than subsections (a) and (f), is applicable. The cause is therefore remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
BOOTH and WIGGINTON, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
William v. Gruber, Jr., 613 So. 2d 1353 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993)…there was no competent, substantial evidence to support the JCC’s conclusion that claimant worked substantially all of the requisite 13 weeks. See, e.g., Spartan Elecs. v. Russell, 513 So. 2d 153 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987); Mendzee v. National Roofing Co., 417 So. 2d 841 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982). Because section 440.14(l)(a) is inapplicable to Gruber under the facts of this case, we remand for the JCC to determine Gru- [*1355] ber’s AWW by using the most applicable of the alternative methods provided in section 440.14(l…