PRICHARD ET AL.
v.
UNITED STATES
PRICHARD ET AL.
UNITED STATES
158 F.2d 952
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (1946)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 20 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Indicted for conspiracy to violate various provisions of the Internal Revenue laws, both defendants were convicted. They appealed, assigning error on the ground that the evidence was insufficient to warrant conviction. The evidence of Pruitt’s guilt is overwhelming, indeed, we think it hardly permits of any other reasonable conclusion than that he was guilty.. As to Prichard, although the evidence is not nearly so strong, it yet presents a chain of circumstances pointing, in the absence of adequate explanation, unerringly to his guilt.1 The judgment is affirmed.
Nounes v. United States, 5 Cir., 4 F. 2d 833.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (20 total)
-
Rent v. United States, 209 F.2d 893 (5th Cir. 1954)
-
Ramirez v. United States, 263 F.2d 385 (5th Cir. 1959)
-
Cervantes v. United States, 263 F.2d 800 (9th Cir. 1959)
Previewing 3 of 20 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Nounes v. United States, 4 F.2d 833 (5th Cir. 1925)