THE FLORIDA BAR, COMPLAINANT,
v.
THOMAS E. HUNT, RESPONDENT

Fla. | 1982-06-10
No. 60846
ADKINS, Acting C. J., and OVERTON, ALDERMAN, McDONALD and EHRLICH, JJ., concur.
417 So. 2d 967 Florida Supreme Court (1982) Positive Treatment
Cited by 6 cases


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

The Florida Bar charged one of its members, Thomas E. Hunt, with neglecting a legal matter entrusted to him. The referee found that respondent Hunt was guilty of violating disciplinary rules 6-101(A)(3) and 1-102(A)(6) and, finding that respondent had a previous disciplinary record, recommended that respondent be suspended from the practice of law “for a period of not less than one hundred and twenty (120) days.”

Another disciplinary proceeding is presently pending against respondent in The Florida Bar v. Hunt, 417 So. 2d 966 (Fla. 1982), in which respondent has been temporarily suspended. We approve the referee’s findings in the instant matter and suspend respondent for six months and thereafter until he furnishes proof of rehabilitation. The suspension shall commence at the termination of the temporary suspension ordered in Case No. 60,723 unless otherwise ordered in that case. Respondent shall pay the cost of these proceedings, $654.53.

It is so ordered.

ADKINS, Acting C. J., and OVERTON, ALDERMAN, McDONALD and EHRLICH, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • THE Florida BAR v. Greene, 463 So. 2d 213 (Fla. 1985)
    …story, a public reprimand is insufficient punishment for these violations. Respondent’s misconduct, when viewed in conjunction with his disciplinary history, clearly requires a 90-day suspension from the practice of law. See The Florida Bar v. Hunt, 417 So. 2d 967 (Fla.1982); The Florida Bar v. Valantiejus, 355 So. 2d 425 (Fla.1978). I also believe that a three-year probationary period should be imposed after the respondent is reinstated. ALDERMAN and EHRLICH, JJ., concur.…
  • THE Florida BAR v. Grant, 514 So. 2d 1075 (Fla. 1987)
    …lar nature should warrant an even more severe discipline than might dissimilar conduct.” The Florida Bar v. Bern, 425 So. 2d 526, 528 (Fla.1982). We find the recommended discipline appropriate in the instant case. See e.g., The Florida Bar v. Hunt, 417 So. 2d 967 (Fla.1982); The Florida Bar v. Fath, 391 So. 2d 213 (Fla.1980). We, therefore, approve the referee’s report and adopt his recommendations. Richard Wayne Grant is hereby suspended from the practice of law for a period of four months and thereafter un…
  • THE Florida BAR v. Hunt, 441 So. 2d 618 (Fla. 1983)
    …explain a settlement agreement to a client, and the other for charging a fee in excess of that agreed upon by the client. On June 10, 1982, respondent was suspended for six (6) months for neglecting the affairs of a client. The Florida Bar v. Hunt, 417 So. 2d 967 (Fla.1982). Additionally, on March 31,1983, respondent was disbarred from the practice of law for practicing law in the form of a professional association wherein non-lawyers were corporate officers and directors, practicing law while suspended for…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw