POMPEIAN OLIVE OIL CORPORATION, LIBELLANT-APPELLANT,

v.

STEAMSHIP PONCE, HER ENGINES, ETC., SAN JUAN SHIPPING COMPANY, INC., CLAIMANT-APPELLEE, AND MACANDREWS & FORBES COMPANY, IMPLEADED, RESPONDENT-APPELLEE

3d Cir. | 1947-03-14

No. 9234

160 F.2d 107 United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit (1947) Positive Treatment

Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Examination of the briefs and appendices and consideration of the oral argument convince us that the court below committed no error. Consequently the decree of the court below, 67 F.Supp. 725, will be affirmed.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

Reider v. Thompson, 197 F.2d 158 (5th Cir. 1952)
Tuschman v. The Pa. R.R. Co., 230 F.2d 787 (3d Cir. 1956)

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw

POMPEIAN OLIVE OIL CORPORATION, LIBELLANT-APPELLANT, v. STEAMSHIP PONCE, HER ENGINES, ETC., SAN JUAN SHIPPING COMPANY, INC., CLAIMANT-APPELLEE, AND MACANDREWS & FORBES COMPANY, IMPLEADED, RESPONDENT-APPELLEE

PER CURIAM.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

POMPEIAN OLIVE OIL CORPORATION, LIBELLANT-APPELLANT,

v.

STEAMSHIP PONCE, HER ENGINES, ETC., SAN JUAN SHIPPING COMPANY, INC., CLAIMANT-APPELLEE, AND MACANDREWS & FORBES COMPANY, IMPLEADED, RESPONDENT-APPELLEE