THOMPSON
v.
SMITH, SUPERINTENDENT OF STATE PENITENTIARY

9th Cir. | 1947-05-16
161 F.2d 728 United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (1947) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied because it is procedurally improper and the petitioner has not exhausted state remedies.


Facts & Procedural History

Petitioner sought a writ of certiorari, which is inapplicable, and also sought leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Petitioner had previously been unsu…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

This petition for a “writ of certiorari”-should be denied for several reasons:

1. We assume t-hat the petitioner means to bring a proceeding in habeas corpus, since certiorari would have no application in a case of this kind. The petition,, however, is addressed to this court, which; does not issue a writ of habeas corpus except in aid of its appellate jurisdiction. The petition for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, on the other hand, is addressed to the “Chief Justice and Justices” of this-court.

The petitioner was unsuccessful in. his effort to get habeas corpus in the state court and in the court below, but he did not appeal. The district court declined to let him proceed in forma pauperis, and the petitioner’s efforts to get habeas corpus from that court ended at that point.

2. The petitioner has not exhausted his state remedies. He has not triedcoram nobis. He erroneously asserts that such writ is not open to him because “the errors set forth were known to the court at time judgment and sentence was [sic] pronounced.” This is not correct. The peti tioner pleaded guilty in the state court, and none of the points he now urges were raised, and therefore none were adjudicated.

The petition is denied.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw