JAMES ALLEN, APPELLANT,
v.
FLORIDA PAROLE & PROBATION COMMISSION, APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 1982-08-11
No. AE-428
BOOTH and THOMPSON, JJ„ concur.
417 So. 2d 1148 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1982) Negative Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
MILLS, Judge.

MILLS, Judge.

Allen appeals Commission action establishing his presumptive parole release date. We affirm.

Allen’s ex post facto argument is indistinguishable from that rejected in Lopez v. Florida Parole and Probation Commission, 410 So. 2d 1354 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982).

No error has been shown in the aggravations for concurrent sentences.

BOOTH and THOMPSON, JJ„ concur.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Allied Parcel Delivery & CNA Ins. Co. v. Dixon, 466 So. 2d 439 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985)
    …award, the E/C challenge the adequacy of Dixon’s job search. The adequacy of a job search is irrelevant because the deputy found Dixon “medically unable to engage in any type of physical activity or return to work.” See, Apopka Greenhouse v. Scott, 417 So. 2d 1148 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982). Because the parties stipulated no medical benefits were claimed, the E/C contend the deputy had no authority to find Dr. Nadel authorized to treat Dixon. Normally, a deputy has no authority to exceed the agreed scope of a heari…
  • Mahoney v. Mixson, 659 So. 2d 327 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995)
    …PER CURIAM. Affirmed. Dills v. Tomoka Land Co., 108 So. 2d 896 (Fla.lst DCA 1959); see also Budget Electric Co. v. Strauss, 417 So. 2d 1148 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982). BARFIELD, KAHN and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw