MICHIGAN WINDOW CLEANING COMPANY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT,
v.
THOMAS MARTINO ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLEES
MICHIGAN WINDOW CLEANING COMPANY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT,
THOMAS MARTINO ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLEES
164 F.2d 93
United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit (1947)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
This appeal having been heard on the record, briefs and oral argument of counsel, and it appearing to the Court that the order of December 3, 1946, herein appealed from is not a final decision subject to review under Section 128(a) of the Judicial Code, Section 225(a), Title 28 U.S.C.A.; it is ordered that the appeal herein be and is dismissed. Catlin v. United States, 324 U.S. 229, 65 S.Ct. 631, 89 L.Ed. 911; Leonard v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Company, 7 Cir., 130 F. 2d 535, and cases therein cited.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Mich. Window Cleaning Co. v. Martino, 173 F.2d 466 (6th Cir. 1949)
-
Owens v. Hinds, 189 F.2d 518 (10th Cir. 1951)
Authorities Cited
- Catlin v. United States, 324 U.S. 229 (U.S. 1945)
- Leonard v. Socony-Vacuum OIL Co., Inc., 130 F.2d 535 (7th Cir. 1942)