TOMAS GOMEZ, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
TOMAS GOMEZ, APPELLANT,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
418 So. 2d 275
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1982)
Negative Treatment
Cited by 16 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. State v. Cumbie, 380 So. 2d 1031 (Fla.1980); Jenkins v. Anderson, 447 U.S. 231, 100 S.Ct. 2124, 65 L.Ed.2d 86 (1980); Salvatore v. State, 366 So. 2d 745 (Fla.1978), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 885, 100 S.Ct. 177, 62 L.Ed.2d 115 (1979); United States v. Halbert, 640 F. 2d 1000 (9th Cir. 1981); Harris v. State, 414 So. 2d 242 (Fla. 3d DCA Case no. 81-1904, opinion filed, May 11, 1982); Section 924.33, Fla.Stat. (1979).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Carmella Meehan v. The Celotex Corp., 466 So. 2d 1100 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985)…terms in dealing’ with an issue such as this. But it is only the legal context which gives meaning to a neutral or otherwise unclear legal term. See Barrington v. State, 145 Fla. 61, 199 So. 320, 323 (1940); Flagship National Bank of Miami v. King, 418 So. 2d 275, 278 n. 6 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Satz v. Blankenship, 407 So. 2d 396 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981), pet. for review denied, 413 So. 2d 877 (Fla.1982). In short, by mechanically, but wholly inappropriately, transposing statutory expressions from settings in whic…
-
Est. OF H. Ransley Sage v. Sage, 515 So. 2d 1324 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987)…eedings, the law in effect at the date of the decedent’s death is the correct law to be applied. Moldofsky v. Stregack, 449 So. 2d 918 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984), reversed on other grounds, 474 So. 2d 206 (Fla.1985); Flagship National Bank of Miami v. King, 418 So. 2d 275, 277 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Estate of Garcia v. Garcia, 399 So. 2d 486, 489, (Fla. 3d DCA), petition for review denied, 407 So. 2d 1103 (Fla.1981); Topper v, Stewart, 388 So. 2d 1270 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980), petition for review denied, 397 So. 2d 779 (Fla.1…
-
Trapani v. Carmela Gagliardi, 502 So. 2d 957 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987)…d a subsequent confirming memorandum relating back in time to the premarital oral agreement and thus satisfied the requisites of section 732.702 without there having been a disclosure of assets. Dolores cited Flagship National Bank of Miami v. King, 418 So. 2d 275 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982), in support of her argument. King held that such “an agreement ... actually reached— without disclosure [of assets] — before the parties marry [is enforceable] if it is reduced to writing at any stage, either before or after the m…
Previewing 3 of 8 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Jenkins v. Anderson, 447 U.S. 231 (U.S. 1980)
- LeDuc v. Florida, 444 U.S. 885 (U.S. 1979)
- State v. Cumbie, 380 So. 2d 1031 (Fla. 1980)
- Salvatore v. State, 366 So. 2d 745 (Fla. 1978)
- United States v. Halbert, 640 F.2d 1000 (9th Cir. 1981)
- Putts v. Fla. Parole & Prob. Comm'n, 414 So. 2d 242 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982)
- Carlton Harris v. State, 414 So. 2d 242 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982)