ERD V. CROWELL, APPELLANT,
v.
BAKER OIL TOOLS, INC., APPELLEE
ERD V. CROWELL, APPELLANT,
BAKER OIL TOOLS, INC., APPELLEE
165 F.2d 214
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (1948)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
The order appealed from is affirmed upon the authority of Kessler v. Eldred, 206 U.S. 285, 27 S.Ct. 611, 51 L.Ed. 1065; Marshall v. Bryant Electric Co., 1 Cir., 185 F. 499; Directoplate Corporation v. Huebner-Bleistein Patents Co., 7 Cir., 44 F. 2d 783; Aleograph Co. v. Electrical Research Products, 5 Cir., 82 F. 2d 625; General Chemical Co. v. Standard Wholesale Phosphate & Acid Works, 4 Cir., 101 F. 2d 178; United States Galvanizing & Plating Equipment Corporation v. Hanson-Van Winkle-Munning Co., 4 Cir., 104 F. 2d 856; Fretwell v. Gillette Safety Razor Co., 4 Cir., 106 F. 2d 728.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Leishman v. Radio Condenser Co., 167 F.2d 890 (9th Cir. 1948)
Authorities Cited
- Kessler v. Eldred, 206 U.S. 285 (U.S. 1907)
- Gen. Chem. Co. v. Standard Wholesale Phosphate & Acid Works, Inc., 101 F.2d 178 (4th Cir. 1939)
- United States Galvanizing & Plating Equip. Corp. v. Hanson-Van Winkle-Munning Co., 104 F.2d 856 (4th Cir. 1939)
- Fretwell v. Gillette Safety Razor Co., 106 F.2d 728 (4th Cir. 1939)
- Directoplate Corp. v. Huebner-Bleistein Patents Co., 44 F.2d 783 (7th Cir. 1930)
- Aleograph Co. v. Elec. Research Prods., Inc., 82 F.2d 625 (5th Cir. 1936)