THE PANAGHIA KATHARIOTISA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that an order releasing an arrested vessel in a possessory suit is an appealable final order because it effectively terminates the possessory action.
A libellant arrested a steamship in a possessory suit. The claimant moved to release the vessel upon posting a stipulation. The district court granted…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Arrest Of Vessel cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
The libellant in a possessory suit in admiralty, in which the Steamship Panaghia Kathariotisa has been arrested and is now in the custody of the United States Marshal, appeals from an order of the district court directing that upon the filing of a stipulation in the amount of $125,000 a writ shall issue to restore the steamship to the claimant, Andreas G. Caravias. At the outset we are confronted with a motion by the claimant, appearing specially, to dismiss the appeal upon the ground that the order in question is a non-appealable interlocutory order. The motion to dismiss must be denied. The result of the order appealed from is to release the steamship from arrest. This in effect terminates the proceeding as against her and puts it out of the power of the district court to give the libellant that possession of the vessel to which he is entitled if he prevails. The Daisy, D.C.Mass., 1886, 29 F. 300. The order thus ends the suit for possessory relief as effectually as if it formally dismissed the libel. The Attualita, 4 Cir., 1916, 238 F. 909; The Pesaro, 1921, 255 U.S. 216, 41 S.Ct. 308, 65 L.Ed. 592.
Upon consideration of the libel and of the affidavits filed by the parties we are satisfied that retention by the court of possession of the vessel, pending the determination of the parties’ rights in her, is peculiarly imperative in this case because of its extraordinary circumstances. Accordingly we will reverse the order appealed from and will direct that the libel be set down for hearing and decision on the merits at the earliest convenient time. 2 Benedict on Admiralty, 6th Ed., p. 613.
It will be so ordered.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Swift & Co. Packers v. Compania Colombiana del Caribe, 339 U.S. 684 (U.S. 1950)
-
Redding & Co., Inc. v. Russwine Constr. Corp., 417 F.2d 721 (D.C. Cir. 1969)
-
In re Kingstate OIL v. M/V Green Star. (Two Cases), 815 F.2d 918 (3d Cir. 1987)
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- The Pesaro, 255 U.S. 216 (U.S. 1921)