MICHIGAN CONSOLIDATED GAS CO.
v.
FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION (PANHANDLE EASTERN PIPE LINE CO., INTERVENOR)

D.C. Cir. | 1948-03-25
No. 9718
167 F.2d 264 United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia (1948) Positive Treatment
Cited by 16 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

The petition asks us to review, and to set aside in part, a Federal Power Commission order of November 2, 1945, which fixed rate schedules for natural gas sold to the petitioner by Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company; and also to'review and set aside a Commission order of October 8, 1947, which dismissed petitioner’s application for rehearing. Since neither the petition for review nor the application for rehearing was filed within the time allowed by the Natural Gas Act, 52 Stat. 821, 831, Sec. 19, 15 U.S.C.A. § 717r, we lack jurisdiction to review these orders.

The petition also asks us to review and set aside recent statements of the Commission to the effect that the 1945 order has a designated meaning, that petitioner and the Pipe Line Company have violated it, and that the Commission plans “to proceed in accordance with the legal remedies available to it under the Natural Gas Act to enforce compliance.” These statements of the Commission are not orders within the reviewing authority that Congress has conferred upon appellate courts. What the 1945 order means, and whether petitioner has violated it, are questions not for this court but for the District Court in which the Commission may attempt to enforce the order. The Commission’s motion to dismiss the petition for review is therefore granted.

Petition for review dismissed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

Previewing 3 of 8 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw