ATALLAH ET AL.
v.
B. H. HUBBERT & SON, INC.

4th Cir. | 1948-07-07
No. 5756
Before PARKER and DOBIE, Circuit Judges, and WATKINS, District Judge.
168 F.2d 993 United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit (1948) Positive Treatment
Cited by 14 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal challenging the constitutionality of the Portal-to-Portal Act of May 14, 1947, 29 U.S.C.A. § 251 et seq. Counsel for appellants admit that it presents the precise point which was decided by this Court adversely to their contention in Seese v. Bethleham Steel Co., 4 Cir., 1948, 168 F. 2d 58. Counsel for appellants here were heard as amici curiae in that appeal; and the arguments they now advance were fully considered when that case was before us. There is nothing in their present argument which calls for a reconsideration of what we have so recently decided; and we do not feel that anything need be added to what we had to say in our opinion in the Seese case. The judgment below will accordingly be affirmed on the authority of that decision.

Affirmed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

Previewing 3 of 7 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw