MARIO PEREZ, MIGUEL DIAZ, DOMINGO MOREJON, ROLANDO ALONSO AND FRANCISCO HIDALGO, APPELLANTS,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
MARIO PEREZ, MIGUEL DIAZ, DOMINGO MOREJON, ROLANDO ALONSO AND FRANCISCO HIDALGO, APPELLANTS,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
418 So. 2d 1107
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1982)
Negative Treatment
Cited by 48 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.190(c)(4); State v. Aaron, 409 So. 2d 1214 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982); State v. Bethea, 409 So. 2d 1139 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982); State v. Holder, 400 So. 2d 162 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); State v. Upton, 392 So. 2d 1013 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981). State v. Benitez, 395 So. 2d 514 (Fla. 1981).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (23 total)
-
de Clements v. de Clements, 662 So. 2d 1276 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995)…2d 865 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993); Mestre Rental Co. v. Resources Recovery (Dade County), Inc., 568 So. 2d 1344 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990); Model v. Model, 472 So. 2d 867 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985); Ferris v. Ferris, 417 So. 2d 1066 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982); Ben-Hain v. Tacher, 418 So. 2d 1107 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Sitomer v. Sitomer, 397 So. 2d 373 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981). This court now places a new interpretation on Rule 1.490(f), Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, by requiring a written record of the evidence received by the Master to be fil…1 / 3
-
Guadine v. Guadine, 474 So. 2d 1245 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985)…master’s report is clothed with a presumption of correctness and should be approved and adopted by the trial court unless clearly erroneous or unless it appears that the master has misconceived the legal effect of the evidence.” Ben-Hain v. Tacher, 418 So. 2d 1107, 1108 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); see also Harmon v. Harmon, 40 So. 2d 209 (Fla.1949); Broudy v. Broudy, 423 So. 2d 504 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Sitomer v. Sitomer, 397 So. 2d 373 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981); Hemminger v. Hemminger, 391 So. 2d 254 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980), r…
-
Tuttle v. Miami Dolphins, Ltd., 551 So. 2d 477 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988)…2d 383 (Fla. 3d DCA 1962); Broward County Port Authority v. F.M. Rule & Co., 119 So. 2d 82 (Fla. 2d DCA 1960). The rule is the same in cases, such as the present one, where the challenge is to the sufficiency of the evidence. See Ben-Hain v. Tacher, 418 So. 2d 1107 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Damkohler v. Damkohler, 336 So. 2d 1243 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976); Brown v. Householder, 134 So. 2d 801 (Fla. 2d DCA 1961). See generally 5 M. Belli, Modern Trials § 71.3, at 456 (2d ed. 1982) (“In all jurisdictions there is the genera…1 / 2
Previewing 3 of 23 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- State v. Benitez, 395 So. 2d 514 (Fla. 1981)
- State v. Upton, 392 So. 2d 1013 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981)
- State v. Bethea, 409 So. 2d 1139 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982)
- Dade Cnty. Pub. Health Tr. v. Fuentes, 400 So. 2d 162 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981)
- State v. Holder, 400 So. 2d 162 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981)
- Hurlston v. Lyres Bros. S.S. Co., Inc., 409 So. 2d 1214 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982)
- Arvida Corp. v. Eryk Larson, 409 So. 2d 1214 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982)