AUGUSTUS FEDERER ET AL., APPELLANTS,
v.
AMERICAN PRESIDENT LINES, LTD., ET AL., APPELLEES
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court affirmed the decree regarding the maintenance claim but reversed it concerning the war bonus claim, ordering a decree consistent with a prior related case.
Libellants were unlicensed personnel on a vessel during a voyage, consolidated for hearing with a prior case involving similar personnel and claims. T…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
The per curiam opinion and the decree entered in this appeal are ordered set aside and the following substituted therefore:
On the hearing below, this appeal was consolidated for hearing with and submitted there on the same evidence as in Agnew et al v. American President Lines Ltd., et al., 177 F. 2d 107, No. 11,943. The appeals were heard and submitted on the record of the hearings below, so consolidated.
The libellants and appellants were unlicensed personnel on the Steamer President Harrison, and were on the same voyage as those in the Agnew case. Our views of this appeal are those expressed of the rights of the unlicensed personnel in our opinion as amended, in No. 11,943, filed on Sept. 9, 1949.
We affirm the decree in the instant appeal, 73 F.Supp. 944, so far as concerns the claim for maintenance. We reverse it as to the claim for a war bonus and order the entry of a decree in the same terms as ordered on the petition for rehearing in appeal No. 11,943, filed Sept. 9, 1949.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Armstrong v. Matson Navigation Co., 183 F.2d 637 (9th Cir. 1950)
Authorities Cited
- Agnew v. Am. President Lines, 177 F.2d 107 (9th Cir. 1949)