REICHARD
v.
WELLS

D.C. Cir. | 1949-10-24
No. 9983
Before EDGERTON, WILBUR K. MILLER, and PRETTYMAN, Circuit Judges.
178 F.2d 710 United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia (1949) Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Appellee has recovered judgment against appellant for false arrest and malicious prosecution. Though the evidence is conflicting and by no means conclusive we think it sufficient to support the jury’s verdict. We find no merit in appellant’s objection to the court’s charge. Since appellant did not object to the court’s definition of malice we do not consider whether it was correct.

Affirmed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw