UNITED STATES
v.
MINKOFF ET AL.
UNITED STATES
MINKOFF ET AL.
181 F.2d 538
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (1950)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 22 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Appellants’ motion asks that we remand this case to the district court in order that they may there seek a new trial for newly discovered evidence. Under Rule 33 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, 18 U.S.C.A.1 we should only entertain such a motion in case the district court indicates, after a hearing, that it intends to grant a motion for a new trial.
. Rakes v. United States, 4 Cir., 163 F. 2d 771; Dession, New Rules of Criminal Procedure, 56 Yale L.J. (1947) 197, 232; N. Y. Univ. School of Law Institute-Proceedings, Vol. VI, p. 208.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (11 total)
-
Metcalf v. United States, 195 F.2d 213 (6th Cir. 1952)
-
United States v. Comulada, 340 F.2d 449 (2d Cir. 1965)
-
United States v. Frame, 454 F.2d 1136 (9th Cir. 1972)
Previewing 3 of 11 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Rakes v. United States, 163 F.2d 771 (4th Cir. 1947)