CHAMBLESS
v.
WOODS, HOUSING EXPEDITER
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that the admission of oral testimony regarding maximum rental was improper because the official record was the best evidence.
The local rent attorney was permitted to give oral testimony about the maximum allowable rental, over the defendant's objection. The defendant argued …
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Best Evidence Rule cases and more on FLexlaw
WALLER, Circuit Judge.
The local rent attorney was allowed, over the objection of counsel for the defendant, to give oral testimony as to what was the maximum allowable rental on the housing accommodations involved in this case.
We think that the objection was well taken and should have been sustained. The record, which was available to the Government and which apparently was in custody of the witness, was the best evidence. See Woods v. Swank, 5 Cir., 170 F. 2d 885.
It will not do to say that the defendant was offered access to the records h-y the Court and that defendant could have offered same in evidence had she seen fit. The burden of making proof as to the maximum rental was on the plaintiff.
Since the judgment must be reversed for the aforementioned error in the trial, it is not necessary that we pass upon the specification of error based upon the refusal of the Court below to dissolve the injunction.. Cf. Moore v. U. S., 5 Cir., 182 F. 2d 332; U. S. v. Moore, 5 Cir., 182 F2d 336; Jackson v. Woods (Woods v. Jackson), 5 Cir.,182 F. 2d 338.
Reversed and remanded.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (12 total)
-
United States v. Pisciotta, 199 F.2d 603 (2d Cir. 1952)
-
Smith v. United States, 205 F.2d 768 (10th Cir. 1953)
-
United States v. Mordecai M. Miller, 254 F.2d 523 (2d Cir. 1958)
Previewing 3 of 12 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Moore et ux. v. United States, 182 F.2d 332 (5th Cir. 1950)
- United States v. Moore et ux, 182 F.2d 336 (5th Cir. 1950)
- Woods v. Swank et ux., 170 F.2d 885 (5th Cir. 1948)
- Jackson v. Woods, 182 F.2d 338 (5th Cir. 1950)