EDWARD EARL GLISSON, APPELLANT,

v.

FLORIDA PAROLE AND PROBATION COMMISSION, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Elzie Cook v. Fla. Parole & Prob. Comm'n, 423 So. 2d 492 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982)
  …orida Administrative Code, Sala v. Florida Parole and Probation Commission, 414 So. 2d 263 (Fla.lst DCA 1982); Perkins v. Florida Parole and Probation Commission, 414 So. 2d 264 (Fla.1st DCA 1982); Glisson v. Florida Parole and Probation Commission, 420 So. 2d 336 (Fla.lst DCA 1982). Finally, a review of the record shows that although Cook has completed self-help programs, as the examiner found, he has also received two disciplinary reports that were not mentioned by the examiner. The commission was justifi…
• Variance v. Fla. Parole & Prob. Comm'n, 420 So. 2d 369 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982)
  …mission’s consideration of a prisoner’s multiple offenses when it establishes his presumptive parole release date, even though the trial judge may have sentenced him concurrently on those offenses. Glisson v. Florida Parole and Probation Commission, 420 So. 2d 336 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982); Gaddy v. Florida Parole and Probation Commission, 416 So. 2d 836 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982). AFFIRMED. MILLS, ERVIN and WIGGINTON, JJ., concur.…
• Theadell Deloach v. Fla. Parole & Prob. Comm'n, 423 So. 2d 480 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982)
  …the two concurrent convictions. As to Deloach’s final point, the commission properly aggravated his score using concurrent sentences pursuant to Rule 23-19.01(5), Florida Administrative Code. In Glisson v. Florida Parole and Probation Commission, 420 So. 2d 336 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982) [7 FLW 2082], this Court held that “the use of concurrent sentences as aggravating factors ... does not encroach on the function of the judiciary and does not violate the separation of powers clause, Article II, Section 3, Florid…

Authorities Cited

• Marsh v. Garwood, 65 So. 2d 15 (Fla. 1953)
• McRAE v. State, 408 So. 2d 775 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982)
• State v. Amato, 408 So. 2d 775 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982)