MASONITE CORPORATION
v.
FLY, COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE

5th Cir. | 1950-06-14
No. 13086
Before HUTCHESON, Chief Judge, and McCORD and RUSSELL, Circuit Judges.
182 F.2d 934 Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (1950) Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

The existence of tax liability under the provisions of Section 3475 of the Internal Revenue Code, 26 U.S.C.A. § 3475, levying a tax on the transportation of property, depends upon whether the transaction in question in any case is “transportation” within the terms of the statute. This is generally a question of fact to be determined in the light of the applicable statute and regulations, and only in the clearest case should be determined upon the pleadings alone. The allegations of the complaint in the present case do not establish liability to the transportation tax as a matter of law. The defendant can not admit each of the allegations of the complaint, together with any reasonable inference flowing from their establishment, and defeat recovery of the tax alleged to have been illegally exacted. The Court therefore erred in sustaining the motion to dismiss the complaint. The facts of the case should have been developed by evidence or stipulation, and proper findings of fact and conclusions of law entered thereon. The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded in order that this may be done.

Judgment Reversed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw