HOPSON
v.
SMYTH
HOPSON
SMYTH
182 F.2d 936
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit (1950)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
This is an appeal in a habeas corpus case. The appellant is held in custody under the judgment of a Virginia state court; and it appears not only that there is no merit in his petition but also that he has not exhausted his remedies under state law. The order of the lower court would, therefore, he affirmed if the appeal were properly before us. Darr v. Burford, 339 U.S. 200, 70 S.Ct. 587; Washington v. Smyth, 4 Cir., 167 F. 2d 658. It is not properly before us, however, because not supported by a certificate of probable cause as required by 28 U.S.C.A. § 2253, and must accordingly be dismissed. Bernard v. Brady, 4 Cir., 164 F. 2d 881.
Appeal dismissed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Harris v. Ellis, 204 F.2d 685 (5th Cir. 1953)
-
Lyle v. Eidson, 197 F.2d 327 (8th Cir. 1952)
Authorities Cited
- Darr v. Burford, 339 U.S. 200 (U.S. 1950)
- Bernard v. Brady, 164 F.2d 881 (4th Cir. 1947)
- Washington v. Smyth, 167 F.2d 658 (4th Cir. 1948)