RANDOLPH LABORATORIES, INC.,
v.
SPECIALTIES DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION

3d Cir. | 1950-11-29
No. 10220
Before MARIS, McLAUGHLIN and STALEY, Circuit Judges.
185 F.2d 403 United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit (1950) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

This case was here before. 3 Cir., 178 F. 2d 477. Certiorari was applied for iby the plaintiff and denied. 339 U.S. 953, 70 S.Ct. 810. The present appeal is from the judgment entered pursuant to our mandate. A clerical error was made in that judgment, the words “by those models in which there is a safety device to which the coupling of the intake or discharge pipe is screwed or otherwise affixed, and not” having been omitted immediately before the words “by those models in which the coupling is placed over the safety device, being affixed to the member into which that device is screwed, instead of being screwed to the device itself.” The defendant offered to agree to the correction of the error by the amendment of the judgment to include the omitted language but the plaintiff refused to cooperate. Instead it took the present appeal, apparently with the idea that it might induce us thereby to reconsider the issues settled by our mandate.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw