LOPEZ
v.
UNITED STATES
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Federal Habeas Corpus Jurisdiction cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
This is an appeal from an order denying a motion to vacate a sentence which appellant contends the District Court had no jurisdiction to impose. The motion was made pursuant to the provisions of § 2255, 28 U.S.C.A. It was stipulated during the argument of the appeal that the appellant is not in custody under the sentence he is attacking. In fact, the said sentence has been served. Appellant is now in custody under a separate, distinct and unrelated sentence.
Upon authority of Crow v. United States, 9 Cir., 186 F. 2d 704, the judgment is affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (13 total)
-
Marine Transp. Lines, Inc. v. Green, 114 So. 2d 710 (Fla. 1st DCA 1959)
-
Amos Black v. United States, 269 F.2d 38 (9th Cir. 1959)
-
Shelton v. United States, 242 F.2d 101 (5th Cir. 1957)
Previewing 3 of 13 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Crow v. United States, 186 F.2d 704 (9th Cir. 1950)