RONALD WAYNE BRADBURY, APPELLANT,
v.
FLORIDA PAROLE AND PROBATION COMMISSION, APPELLEE
RONALD WAYNE BRADBURY, APPELLANT,
FLORIDA PAROLE AND PROBATION COMMISSION, APPELLEE
420 So. 2d 901
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1982)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
MILLS, Judge.
Bradbury appeals the establishment of his presumptive parole release date, contending that the Commission erred in calculating his salient factor score. We affirm. Specifically, Bradbury maintains that the Commission acted improperly in using a post-sentence report and a pre-parole investigation in order to establish various prior convictions. We disagree. Jones v. Florida Parole and Probation Commission, 413 So. 2d 861 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982).
AFFIRMED.
ERVIN and WIGGINTON, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Rolle v. Fla. Parole & Prob. Comm'n, 426 So. 2d 1082 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983)…nt of Corrections’ files to which he had no access. See § 945.10(2), Fla.Stat. Normally the Commission is entitled to rely on post sentence investigation reports to establish prior convictions. See Bradbury v. Florida Parole & Probation Commission, 420 So. 2d 901 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982); Jones v. Florida Parole & Probation Commission, 413 So. 2d 861 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982). However, an inmate’s PPRD should not be determined on an erroneous report. We cannot determine from the record in this case whether the appellan…
Authorities Cited
- Jones v. The Fla. Parole & Prob. Comm'n, 413 So. 2d 861 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982)