CLYDE HINES, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
CLYDE HINES, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
420 So. 2d 926
Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1982)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We remand to strike from the order of probation revocation the finding that appellant violated his probation by failing to pay supervision costs. The state failed to present evidence establishing appellant’s ability to pay. Watkins v. State, 368 So. 2d 363 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979). We, however, affirm the revocation order and judgments based on the offenses of theft and attempted burglary.
We also remand for correction of the sentence because the trial court failed to comply with the mandate of section 921.-161(1), Florida Statutes (1981). The sentence must specifically reflect credit for time served. Williams v. State, 360 So. 2d 61 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978).
OTT, C.J., and HOBSON and DANAHY, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Robinson v. State, 468 So. 2d 1106 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985)…e would impose upon appellant. Thus there was no proof before the court that appellant had the ability to pay his supervisory fee. Raines v. State, 445 So. 2d 408 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984); Brown v. State, 429 So. 2d 821 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983); Hines v. State, 420 So. 2d 926 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982); Sillett v. State, 393 So. 2d 53 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981); Coxon v. State, 365 So. 2d 1067 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979). Another finding in the written order of revocation recites that appellant violated condition (8) requiring that he comply wi…
Authorities Cited
- Watkins v. State, 368 So. 2d 363 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979)
- Mark T. Innerst et ux. v. Dade Cnty., 360 So. 2d 61 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978)