ROSE L. STEINBERG, A STOCKHOLDER OF BENDIX HOME APPLIANCES, INC., SUING ON BEHALF OF HERSELF AND ALL OTHER STOCKHOLDERS SIMILARLY SITUATED AND ON BEHALF OF AND IN THE RIGHT OF BENDIX HOME APPLIANCES, INC., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
JOSEPH D. SHARPE, BERNARD E. SMITH AND BENDIX HOME APPLIANCES, INC., DEFENDANTS, W. J. REUSCHER, DEFENDANT-APPELLEE
ROSE L. STEINBERG, A STOCKHOLDER OF BENDIX HOME APPLIANCES, INC., SUING ON BEHALF OF HERSELF AND ALL OTHER STOCKHOLDERS SIMILARLY SITUATED AND ON BEHALF OF AND IN THE RIGHT OF BENDIX HOME APPLIANCES, INC., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
JOSEPH D. SHARPE, BERNARD E. SMITH AND BENDIX HOME APPLIANCES, INC., DEFENDANTS, W. J. REUSCHER, DEFENDANT-APPELLEE
190 F.2d 82
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (1951)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 5 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Judgment affirmed on opinion below. 95 F.Supp. 32.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Isadore Blau v. MAX Factor & Co., 342 F.2d 304 (9th Cir. 1965)
-
B. T. Babbitt, Inc. v. Lachner, 332 F.2d 255 (2d Cir. 1964)
-
Spirt v. Bechtel, 232 F.2d 241 (2d Cir. 1956)
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence