SONIA FONTANEZ, PETITIONER,
v.
AAMCO AUTOMATIC TRANSMISSION CENTER, A/K/A AAMCO TRANSMISSIONS, OWNED AND OPERATED BY LERUCO, INC., RESPONDENT
SONIA FONTANEZ, PETITIONER,
AAMCO AUTOMATIC TRANSMISSION CENTER, A/K/A AAMCO TRANSMISSIONS, OWNED AND OPERATED BY LERUCO, INC., RESPONDENT
421 So. 2d 62
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1982)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
The petition for writ of certiorari is DENIED.
MILLS, ERVIN and WIGGINTON, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Carrillo v. State, 463 So. 2d 450 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985)…of familial relationship between the appellant and the person who allegedly committed the murder. By proving that the appellant was the brother-in-law of Richard Campos, a relationship that is included within the statute’s protection, State v. C.H., 421 So. 2d 62 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982), the state negated its ability to prove a material element of the charge. The court therefore erred in denying appellant’s motion for a judgment of acquittal. We, accordingly, reverse and remand with instructions to discharge th…
-
Brown v. State, 672 So. 2d 861 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996)…eráis.” Thayer v. State, 335 So. 2d 815, 817 (Fla.1976); Tillman v. Smith, 533 So. 2d 928, 929 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988). The terms “consanguinity” and “affinity” have correctly been construed to mean by “blood” and “marriage” respectively. State v. C.H., 421 So. 2d 62, 63-64 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982). The modifying phrase “by consanguinity or affinity” expanded the statute’s immunity provision only to include “in-laws” and “step-relatives.” Id. at 64. While we acknowledge that it is certainly possible for a cousin to s…