DAY-BRITE LIGHTING, INC.
v.
RUBY LIGHTING CORP.
DAY-BRITE LIGHTING, INC.
RUBY LIGHTING CORP.
191 F.2d 521
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (1951)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 6 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed on the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the district court, except as to the judgment for attorneys’ fees. There is no showing or finding of unfairness or bad faith in the conduct of the losing party nor any other equitable consideration of similar force which makes it grossly unfair that the winner of this lawsuit he left to bear the burden of his own counsel fees which prevailing litigants normally bear, to bring the award within the discretionary power conferred in 35 U.S.C.A. §.70. Park-In-Theatres, Inc. v. Perkins, 9 Cir., 190 F. 2d 137.
The judgment is reversed in so far as it awards attorneys’ fees in the sum of $3,000.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Talon, Inc. v. Union Slide Fastener, Inc., 266 F.2d 731 (9th Cir. 1959)
-
Faulkner v. Gibbs, 199 F.2d 635 (9th Cir. 1952)
-
Fla. Brace Corp. & Arthur R. Moore v. Bartels, 332 F.2d 337 (9th Cir. 1964)
Authorities Cited
- Scott v. United States, 190 F.2d 137 (5th Cir. 1951)