PAUL JONES, JR.
v.
PROTECTION MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF CAMBRIA COUNTY, APPELLANT; PAUL JONES, JR. V. COMMONWEALTH MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PENNSYLVANIA, APPELLANT
PAUL JONES, JR.
PROTECTION MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF CAMBRIA COUNTY, APPELLANT; PAUL JONES, JR. V. COMMONWEALTH MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PENNSYLVANIA, APPELLANT
192 F.2d 1018
United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit (1951)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 5 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
The questions presented by the instant appeals are really those of fact. The fact findings made by the court below find full support in the evidence. Consideration of the record, the briefs and of the oral argument convinces us that the court below did not commit error. Accordingly the judgments appealed from will be affirmed. 93 F.Supp. 505, in which motion denied 95 F.Supp. 589.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
M. W. O'Rieley in Bankr. of Woerderhoff Shoe Co., Inc. v. Endicott-Johnson Corp., 297 F.2d 1 (8th Cir. 1961)
-
In re Kaufhold, 256 F.2d 181 (3d Cir. 1958)
-
In re Barbato, 398 F.2d 572 (3d Cir. 1968)
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence