ERNEST BENSON WILLIAMS, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that the conviction must be reversed due to improper joinder and denial of severance of separate criminal episodes.
The defendant was convicted and sentenced for six robberies that were improperly joined.…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Improper Joinder cases and more on FLexlaw
[*664] HENDRY, Judge.
The final judgment of conviction and sentence under review is reversed based upon improper joinder and denial of severance of these similar but separate criminal episodes and remanded with directions to separately retry the defendant for each of the six robberies. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.151, 3.152; Paul v. State, 385 So. 2d 1371 (Fla.1980); Rubin v. State, 407 So. 2d 961 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981); McMullen v. State, 405 So. 2d 479 (Fla.3d DCA 1981); Macklin v. State, 395 So. 2d 1219 (Fla.3d DCA 1981).
We find no error, however, in the trial court’s denial of defendant’s motions for discharge under the speedy trial rule. The record clearly demonstrates that the defendant was not “continuously available for trial” as required by Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.191 since at least three continuances prior to the initial trial were attributable to the defense, and the delay in retrying the defendant within ninety days1 following a mistrial was a direct result of defense counsel’s involvement in trying another case. State v. Belcher, 372 So. 2d 546 (Fla.3d DCA 1979) and cases cited; Roberts v. State, 371 So. 2d 538 (Fla.3d DCA 1979); State v. McCoy, 369 So. 2d 1027 (Fla.3d DCA 1979).
Reversed and remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.
. Commencement of the retrial was less than one month subsequent to the expiration of ninety days from the date the trial court declared a mistrial. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.191(g).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
State v. Ryder, 449 So. 2d 398 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984)…dant, however, did not move for a continuance after the declaration of mistrial and took no other action inconsistent with the application of the rule. Therefore, I would find the trial court properly discharged the defendant. See Williams v. State, 421 So. 2d 663 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982).…
Authorities Cited
- Robles DEL MAR, Inc. v. Town OF Indian River Shores, 385 So. 2d 1371 (Fla. 1980)
- Paul v. State, 385 So. 2d 1371 (Fla. 1980)
- MacKlin v. State, 395 So. 2d 1219 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981)
- McMULLEN v. State, 405 So. 2d 479 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981)
- Rubin v. State, 407 So. 2d 961 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981)
- Emilio Reyes v. State, 369 So. 2d 1027 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979)
- Roberts v. State, 371 So. 2d 538 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979)
- State v. Belcher, 372 So. 2d 546 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979)