OTIS MCALLISTER & CO., INC.
v.
UNITED STATES

5th Cir. | 1952-02-12
No. 13600
Before HUTCHESON, Chief Judge, and RUSSELL and RIVES, Circuit Judges.
194 F.2d 386 Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (1952) Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The court held that green coffee is an article of food under the relevant statute and that the claimant was not entitled to re-export the coffee.


Facts & Procedural History

The United States condemned and forfeited 500 bags of green coffee. The claimant appealed, arguing the coffee was not an article of food and that they…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Appealing from a decree condemning, and forfeiting to the United States, 500 bags of green coffee, claimant is here assigning two grounds of error. One of these is that the court erred in finding and concluding that green coffee is an article of food within the meaning of 21 U.S.C.A. § 321(f).

The other is that it erred in not affording claimant the right to proceed under Sec. 801 of the Act, 21 U.S.C.A. § 381, to have the coffee re-exported.

Unfortunately for claimant, whatever might have been said of them as original propositions, both of its claims of error have already been decided against it in well reasoned opinions.

The first has been decided in principle in U. S. v. 24 Cans* *Ladled Butter, 5 Cir., 148 F. 2d 365; U. S. v. 52 Drums Maple Syrup, 2 Cir., 110 F. 2d 914; Union Dairy Co. v. U. S., 7 Cir., 250 F. 231; and on the precise point, green coffee, in United States v. O. F. Bayer & Co., 2 Cir., 188 F. 2d 555.

The second has been decided against it in 230 Boxes of Fish v. United States, 6 Cir., 168 F. 2d 361.

In full accord with these decisions, we content ourselves with saying so, and, on their authority, order the decree Affirmed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw