DIAZ ET AL.
v.
CROM
PER CURIAM.
This is an appeal from an order denying the defendant’s motion for summary judgment in a plenary suit brought by a trustee in bankruptcy to recover certain described assets which are alleged to belong to the estate of the bankrupt. It is not a final order and therefore is not appealable. Our appellate jurisdiction in plenary suits in the District Court is derived from 28 U.S.C.A. §§ 1291, 1292. It is limited to review of final decisions, except as otherwise therein specified. The order before us is not within the exceptions. Consequently, the appeal must be and the same hereby is dismissed on the authority of In re Finkelstein, 2 Cir., 102 F. 2d 688.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Gerringer v. United States, 213 F.2d 346 (D.C. Cir. 1954)
-
Hillcrest Lumber Co., Inc. v. Terminal Factors, Inc., 281 F.2d 323 (2d Cir. 1960)
-
United States v. Johnson, 238 F.2d 565 (2d Cir. 1956)
Previewing 3 of 7 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- In re Finkelstein. Goldstein v. S. Blechman & Sons, Inc., 102 F.2d 688 (2d Cir. 1939)