WILLIE CLIFFORD PITTS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
WIGGINTON, Judge.
This case comes to us on appeal pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Having reviewed the entire record, we find no reversible error. The trial court did not err in denying appellant’s motions for judgment of acquittal, there being ample evidence to present a jury question. The trial court’s denial of appellant’s motion for continuance did not prejudice appellant, for the alibi witness who threatened not to appear at trial did appear and testify on behalf of appellant. Finally, the trial court did not commit reversible error in not admitting into evidence certain medical documents. The final judgment of conviction and sentence is therefore AFFIRMED.
MILLS and ERVIN, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Kim Ervin & the State of Fla. v. Chason, 750 So. 2d 148 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000)…tions. It is well established that parents cannot contract away their child’s right to support, nor can a mother waive the child’s right by acquiescing in the father’s nonpayment. Armour v. Allen, 377 So. 2d 798 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979); Green v. Horne, 421 So. 2d 788 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982). Parents may modify a court-ordered arrangement only if the child continues to receive a roughly equivalent amount, and such an arrangement serves the best interests of the child. Green, 421 So. 2d at 789; Lester v. Lester, 736 S…
-
Golson v. Golson, 207 So. 3d 321 (Fla. 5th DCA 2016)…ief from the court regarding the same. It is a well-established principle that parents cannot contract away their child’s right to support, nor can one parent waive the child’s right by acquiescing in the other parent’s non-payment. Green v. Horne, 421 So. 2d 788, 789 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982) (citations omitted). However, under some circumstances, parents can modify a court-ordered arrangement for child support provided that the child continues to receive a roughly equivalent amount and the best interests of the…
-
Corrigan v. Vargas (Fla. 5th DCA 2019)…v. Romero, 959 So. 2d 333, 336 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007) (citations omitted). However, Rule 12.540 allows a court to set aside a final order, can one parent waive the child’s right by acquiescing in the other parent’s non-payment.” (citing Green v. Horne, 421 So. 2d 788, 789 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982))). including one ratifying and incorporating an agreement, on the basis of fraud, misrepresentation, or other misconduct of an adverse party. Fla. Fam. L. R. P. 12.540(b)(3). To demonstrate fraud, a moving party is require…
Authorities Cited
- Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (U.S. 1967)