WILLIAM H. BANKS WAREHOUSES, INC., A CORPORATION, AND JOHN ALFRED HALFORD, APPELLANTS,
v.
GEORGE L. WATT ET AL., APPELLEES
WILLIAM H. BANKS WAREHOUSES, INC., A CORPORATION, AND JOHN ALFRED HALFORD, APPELLANTS,
GEORGE L. WATT ET AL., APPELLEES
196 F.2d 1018
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (1952)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 5 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
This appeal is from a judgment in two consolidated actions — an action by William H. Banks Warehouses, Inc., and John Alfred Halford against W. Andrew Jean and others and an action by George L. Watt and others against William H. Banks Warehouses, Inc., and Underwriters at Lloyd’s (London). On the grounds and for the reasons stated in the District Court’s opinion, 96 F.Supp. 731, the judgment is affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Carbo v. United States, 364 U.S. 611 (U.S. 1961)
-
Green v. United States, 351 F.2d 198 (D.C. Cir. 1965)
-
Norbert Derengowski v. The U. S. Marshal, 377 F.2d 223 (8th Cir. 1967)
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence