IN THE MATTER OF MINNIOLA O. MILLER, DEBT-OR-APPELLANT
IN THE MATTER OF MINNIOLA O. MILLER, DEBT-OR-APPELLANT
198 F.2d 267
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (1952)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 5 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Judge Smith has discussed all the perti neiit questions raised by the appellant, 106 F.Supp. 40. He decided that she had proposed no practicable plan of rehabilitation, that her charges of bad faith and fraud were groundless, and dismissed her final petition under the Frazier-Lemke Act, 11 U.S.C.A. § 203, and certain counterclaims under the Sherman and Clayton Acts, 15 U.S.C.A. § 1 et seq. We concur in his action and are convinced that it is past the time when this appellant should be allowed by any means to further prevent her creditors from proceeding in the State Courts to liquidate their claims.
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
United States v. Harris, 216 F.2d 690 (5th Cir. 1954)
-
Minniola O. Miller v. The Town OF Suffield, 249 F.2d 16 (2d Cir. 1957)
-
Commissioner OF Internal Revenue v. Conner, 199 F.2d 369 (5th Cir. 1952)
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence